Research

Rolling out AI tutors without studying their effects is irresponsible.So we are having ours studied.

AI should strengthen teaching, not hollow it out. Nobody can claim that without evidence, so we publish our own research and let a state institute examine our system independently.

Written by us

Our position on AI in teaching.

Run by the bidt, not by us

AIffectiveness: an independent study at ten universities.

The bidt was founded by the Free State of Bavaria and sits inside the Bavarian Academy of Sciences and Humanities. It sets the questions, collects the data and interprets the results. We supply the system and the usage data, nothing else.

Bavarian Academy of Sciences
Funded by StMWK Bayern

First results

86%
of students found OneTutor helpful for exam preparation
84%
of lecturers would deploy it again
84
courses evaluated across 10 universities
1,500+
student responses collected

Summer semester 2025. Data collected and analysed by the bidt research team.

How the data is collected

Not whether AI works, but where it works and where it does not. In real courses, not in a lab. Every semester follows the same rhythm.

01

Before the course

Baseline survey

Students answer inside OneTutor before they start working with it.

02

During the semester

Usage data

Anonymised interactions from large lectures and small seminars alike.

03

End of the course

Follow-up surveys

Students inside OneTutor and in class, lecturers separately by email.

04

After the semester

Analysis and publication

The bidt evaluates, publishes, and the cycle starts again with the next cohort.

What is measured

Learning effectiveness, engagement, exam preparation and teaching feedback, plus how trust in AI develops over time.

What gets published

Everything the study finds, including the results that do not favour us.

Prof. Dr. Alexander Pretschner
I hope that by the end we will understand exactly where these systems are useful and where they are not. It is not just about whether it works, but in what context: large lectures versus small seminars, or fact based disciplines versus argumentative ones.

Prof. Dr. Alexander Pretschner

Chair of Software and Systems Engineering, Technical University of Munich. Scientific Director, fortiss. Founding director of the bidt. Co-founder and Chief Scientific Officer, OneTutor.

Participating institutions

Technical University of Munich
LMU Munich
Virtual University of Bavaria
University of Technology Nuremberg
Rosenheim University of Applied Sciences
University of Augsburg
OTH Amberg-Weiden
University of Bayreuth
Weihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences
Aschaffenburg University of Applied Sciences